Carteret Documentary Nominated for Oscars

Congratulations to Jennifer Redfearn and Tim Metzger on the nomination of SUN COME UP in Best Documentary, Short Subject film at the 83rd Academy Awards for an an Academy Award, the U.S. film industry’s top prize. It was nominated for the Oscar from a list of 30 eligible entries which was narrowed down to eight. The Academy Awards for outstanding film achievements of 2010 will be presented on Sunday, February 27, 2011. Look out for it!

Sun Come Up Trailer from Sun Come Up on Vimeo.

SUN COME UP has been described as “a lyrical documentary that follows the relocation of the first indigenous culture to lose their ancestral land to climate change – the Carteret Islanders, a community of 3,000 people living on a chain of low-lying islands in the South Pacific Ocean. This is a story about the human face of climate change and a people faced with the loss of a land in which their identity rests.”

Project of Hope
The documentary was produced in 2009 when the Carteret Islanders were faced with no options but a bleak future. In that same year however, in May 2009, the Carteret Islands Project was birthed by Natural Resource Ventures Pte Ltd in collaboration with the islanders.

This is a prototype community transformation project owned and driven by the islanders themselves and assisted by a venture philanthropic company based in Singapore in terms of funding, management know-how and technology. The success of this project would empower them with resources which would give them options to find alternative solutions other than relocation.

Striking a Chord

“The sentiment among Pacific Islanders suggests that they do not want to abandon their homelands or be absorbed into cultures where indigenous people already struggle for acceptance. “It is about much more than just finding food and shelter,” said Tarita Holm, an analyst with the Palauan Ministry of Resources and Development. “It is about your identity.” One clan chief said that ”he would rather sink with the islands than leave.” (Refugees Join List of Climate-Change Issues, By Neil MacFarquhar, New York Times, May 28, 2009)

This project has struck a powerful chord with the islanders. If they had a choice, they would rather stay on in their island home. Now they have.

Director Redfearn says about the Carteret islanders’ plight, “I want to move people. I want to either make them angry, make them sad, make them frustrated, and I want to take that anger and that frustration and that sadness and turn that into action.” Voice of America | 7 February 2011

If you have been moved and you want to be part of something that will empower the islanders to stay on in their islands, contact us at ivy@nrv.com.sg

Posted in Community development, Venture Philanthropy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Carteret Islands Transformation Project

The Carteret Islands Project is an innovative community development project. It provides a holistic solution to the plight of the Carteret islanders. The project incorporates a School of Community Entrepreneurial Development that comes with a fishery workshop. Our transformation methodology uses an open school concept to provide a conducive environment where the islanders are given the opportunity to learn how to make a living within the business of making life.

For more information on the project, go to our Project Blog resourceventures.wordpress.com

Posted in Community development, Venture Philanthropy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Investment Philosophy-Part Two

Part Two: NRV Investment Philosophy
NRV seeks to invest in the development of peoples and their natural resources for long term sustainable growth in all aspects of wealth, while managing short-term risks associated with business activities for cashflow.

“Every man shall sit under his own vine [common property of Hebrews] and under his own fig tree [fruitfulness], and no one will make them afraid, for the Lord Almighty had spoken.” (Micah 4:4)

Our Projects set in the beautiful islands are about producing the good fruit that reflects the Seed deposited that originates from the Creator God.

“But he who received seed on the good ground is he who hears the word and understands it, who indeed bears fruit and produces: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.” (Matthew 13:23)

Return to God’s Plan of Prosperity
If there is one message we want to send out concerning our projects, it is the call to return to God’s plan for prosperity.

1. We can start by putting money back to work for productive gain, to benefit man, his family and his community, and not work to monetize capital gain.

2. It means going back to the old fashioned way of organic growth.

3. Fruit is for the common well-being of all and takes time to grow. And this must correlate with the fruitful growth of man’s character and competence. This will result in entrepreneurial self-governing communities that are productive.

4. Our mission of good works should have an impact on the economic realm that will shine the light in a world that is losing hope and searching for answers.

5. Our investment philosophy therefore centers on man and his relationship with his Creator. Man must necessarily be reinstated to the primary position of responsibility as stewards of God-given natural resources in the land and the wonderful faculties his Creator invested in him for service. Our hope is that in this way, the Kingship of Christ abiding in us will be evident to all.

6. As wise investors we should consider our investment intentions and the impact of our actions on society. The leaves in our economic system represent phantom wealth created by the financial system, capital market included whereas fruit represents wealth created through income growth and productive capacity. When we persevere to obtain the fruit, it will give forth manifold returns.

7. We believe in the promises and the teachings of the Bible. The laws of God provide man with the compass and wisdom he needs so as to prosper without trespassing against his neighbor but instead to bless him.

If you like this, you may like to read Part Three: Investment Philosophy-People First Strategy

Posted in Venture Philanthropy | Tagged | Leave a comment

Investment Philosophy-Part Three

People First Strategy

1. Good trees produce good fruit.

2. Our investment model puts the training and development of man as core. The highest risk factor remains in the innate characteristic of man the desire to seek his gain with the least possible pain. Our model would by such a provision, mitigate this very risk.

3. Our strategy is to reinstate Man as the key motivational impetus to wealth creation and to build revenue growth.

4. The production of goods and services must necessarily correlate to the character and competency of the people producing it. If business becomes an end in itself, stated often as profit maximization, the result is the subordination of Man to an enslaved monetary economy.

5. Money is not wealth. It serves as a medium of exchange between buyers and sellers and a store of free capital, not the basic resource in the process of production and distribution.

6. Sowing and reaping. The very foundation of the earth as our God-given provision sets the ground for the principle of sowing and reaping. As such, man has a fundamental place as a steward manager in the path to wealth creation by making sound judgments based on right values and effected through his practices for the common well-being.

7. A Common harvest of wealth. Individuals have different talents and possess unique resources. Collectively, when they are organized as contributors that deploy their different talents and unique resources towards the common harvest of wealth in enterprises, such wealth is holistic and in multiple-fold. They all partake in the rewards as stakeholders, each according to his role and purpose.

NRV MODEL OF HARVEST DISTRIBUTION
Productive Gains
* Land owners (Provider of Resource) 30%
* Venture Servant (Provider of Talent) 30%
* Funders ( Provider of Liquidity) 30%
* Reserves 10%

If you like this, you may like to read 5 Keys to Kingdom Investing

Posted in Venture Philanthropy | 1 Comment

The Roots of Philanthropy

Making a living within the business of making life, Carteret Islanders

Reconnecting to the Roots of Philanthropy
Traditional philanthropy has been synonymous with financial generosity, charitable giving or a charitable organization. The model of philanthropy we know today arose from the industrial age when men who had made their fortunes created foundations as vehicles for their giving. These were symbolized by names like Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller and most lately, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Some of the questions we had been asking are:

~ Is there a model of philanthropy that goes beyond money?
~ Who gets to be philanthropic?
~ What is ‘philanthropy’ actually?

The most authoritative reference of philanthropy is found from the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), 1909, which defines philanthropy as:

1a. Love of mankind; the disposition or active effort to promote the happiness and well-being of others; practical benevolence.

1b. The love of God for humanity. Now rare.

A 2nd century AD definition for philanthropia:
Philanthrôpía. A state of „well-educated habits‟ [eùágôgos êthous] stemming from “love of humans‟ [ànthrô‟pon philían]. A state of being “productive of benefit‟ [eùergetikê] to humans. A state of “grace‟ [cháritos]. Mindfulness [mnê‟mê] together with “good works‟ [eùergesías].”

In the 1828 landmark dictionary of early American English usage published by Noah Webster (1758-1843), he defines philanthropy as: “The love of mankind, benevolence towards the whole human family; universal goodwill.”

From this perspective, philanthropy has existed long before the visible 20th century model that we are familiar with. And it is not limited to financial contributions and fund-raising activities as we know it today.

In its original and purest expression, philanthropy involves all actions and activity that springs out of love for one’s fellow man to promote his well-being. Philanthropy is love expressed in thought, word and deed, cognizant of the fact that God is the author of philanthropy. Such an understanding of philanthropy carries with it a moral force or even imperative to do good.

We see philanthropy as an inspired act dependent on individual judgment. Collectively, it is the means by which “a social group, a family, a giving circle – pulls together their financial, human and intellectual capital to promote the collective social good.” (Copeland-Carson).

With the original definition of philanthropy in view, venture philanthropy is therefore about individuals who voluntarily organize themselves with the object of pulling together their resources in a venture to benefit their fellow men.

Professor J. Gregory Dees, Faculty Director of Duke’s Fuqua School of Business Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship (CASE), suggests a definition of philanthropy:

“as mobilizing and deploying private resources, including money, time, social capital, and expertise, to improve the world in which we live.”

In our view, venture philanthropists are entrepreneurial philanthropists who are willing to take risks in investing their being, time, actions and unique resources for the well-being of their fellow man. Such an enterprise is bigger then any one individual and recognizes different roles, responsibilities, personalities, talents, connections and resources.

>> Philanthropic Nature of Christianity

Posted in Community development, Venture Philanthropy | Leave a comment

Philanthropic Nature of Christianity

THE PHILANTHROPIC NATURE OF CHRISTIANITY
by Wayne Jackson, August 11, 2005

“We love, because he first loved us”
(1 John 4:19).

When the divine Word (Jesus Christ) entered the world as a baby (John 1:1,14), he encountered an environment of harshness and cruelty. One has only to recall that the vicious Herod, acting out of a fear of legal competition, commanded that all the males (two years and under) within the borders of Bethlehem be slain (Matthew 2:16). The Roman world was one of brutality and disrespect for human life.

For example, both Aristotle and Plato favored infanticide (the killing of newborn infants). At Sparta it was the law that newborns be subjected to government inspection, and any deformity in the child made it subject to immediate death.

The cheapness of human life is seen in the fact that men were thrown to wild beasts for the bizarre amusement of the aristocracy. Josephus says that when the Roman ruler Titus was at Caesarea, he honored his brother with a birthday party at which 2,500 Jews were killed, fighting with animals and in battles with one another (Wars 7.3.1; cf. 1 Corinthians 15:32).

The institution of slavery was another token of man’s inhumanity to his fellows. There were some 60,000,000 slaves in the Roman empire. A slave was not viewed as a person; rather, he/she was property to be disposed of at the master’s will. If a slave ran away he/she could be crucified, or, at the discretion of the master, merely be branded on the forehead with the letter “F” (for Fugitive).

In view of these attitudes and actions, it was clear that the religion of the meek and lowly Savior would have an uphill struggle in a world rather barren of philanthropy.

The term “philanthropy” derives from two Greek roots, philos (love, affection), and anthropos (mankind). The word thus reflects that disposition wherein one is inclined to love his fellowman, apart from self-interest. Forms of the Greek term philoanthropy are found three times in the New Testament.

1. In the record of the Acts, Luke employs the noun of the disposition of the citizens of Melita (Malta). These benevolent folks demonstrated uncommon “kindness” (philanthropia) to Paul and his sailing companions when they were thrust ashore on the island during a violent Mediterranean storm (Acts 28:2).

An examination of the context provides a commentary on the meaning of the term. The people of Melita were: generous (vv. 2,7,10), courteous (v. 7), hospitable (v. 7), nondiscriminating (v. 2), and endowed with a sense that there is a justice to which human beings are accountable (v. 4)—though they were without a clear understanding of the ultimate Source.

These people were unable to speak Greek (thus were called “barbarians” – v. 2); however, they spoke the language of human kindness.

2. An adverbial form of the term is found in Acts 27:3. It describes the demeanor of a military centurion whose name was Julius. Julius had been dispatched to guard Paul as the apostle was en route to Rome to appeal his case to the imperial “supreme court.”

Julius treated Paul “kindly” (philanthropos—humanely), permitting him to visit with Christian friends who would see to his needs. When the vessel wrecked, and certain soliders wanted to kill the prisoners (including Paul), Julius stepped in and thwarted the plot, “desiring” to save Paul (Acts 27:43). Likely he was a pagan man, yet he had a sense of philanthropy.

3. The Greek noun reaches its zenith when it is used of the “kindness” (chrestotes—goodness of heart) exhibited by God in his “love toward man” (philanthropia) as reflected in the rich and unselfish gift of “Jesus Christ our Savior” (Titus 3:4-6). What an act of generosity that was (cf. John 3:16)!

While it may be said that to some extent the flame of philanthropy is “innate” to the human spirit, as a result of man’s reflection of the “image” of God, across the centuries sin significantly has reduced that light to but a flicker in not a few instances. It was only the influence of Jesus Christ that brought back its brilliance.

His interest in “every creature” among “all the nations” packs the authority of his own example, in loving the poor (Mark 12:41ff, the despised (Luke 10:30ff), and the wicked (Luke 7:36ff).

The goal of love-for-man rises to its greatest heights in John’s writings by his use of various forms of agape (the exalted love of total dedication). John’s works contain one-third of all the New Testament references to the agape word family. Truly, he earned the appellation, “the apostle of love.”

And one of the most burning passages from his pen are these instructive words: “We love, because he first loved us” (1 John 4:19). A more motivating truth was never written.

——-
In Lifting We Are Lifted

Sadhu Sundar Singh and a companion were traveling through a pass high in the Himalayan Mountains when they came across a body lying in the snow. They checked for vital signs and discovered the man still alive, but barely so. Sundar Singh prepared to stop and help this unfortunate traveler, but his companion objected, saying, “We shall lose our lives if we burden ourselves with him.” Sundar Singh, however, could not think of leaving the man to die in the snow without an attempted rescue on his part. His companion quickly bade him farewell and walked on.

Sundar Singh lifted the poor traveler onto his back. With great exertion on his part, made even greater by the high altitude and snowy conditions, he carried the man onward. As he walked, the heat cast off by his body began to warm the frozen man. He revived and soon, both were walking together side by side, each holding the other up, and in turn, each giving body heat to the other. Before long they came upon yet another traveler’s body lying in the snow. Upon closer inspection, they discovered him to be dead, frozen by the cold.

He was Sundar Singh’s original traveling companion.

Posted in Venture Philanthropy | Tagged | 1 Comment

How Venture Philanthropy Works

The work of community transformation requires resources where self, relationships, organizations, natural resources and money are used in the service of redeeming, preserving and nourishing all life.

Venture philanthropy provides the required resources to open connections and build those bridges for the work of transformation in communities. It ultimately will result in fruitfulness inclusive of an economic dimension. However, venture philanthropic capital does not measure in the usual business terms of return on investment but is motivated by giving for the good of man, putting capital to risk to that end.

What attitude should a venture philanthropist adopt? Conventionally, when we invest, it is a transaction based on what one can get i.e. the financial benefits, from the capital invested. However, in attitude, venture philanthropists are like ‘parents’ who invest into their son with no conditions to that capital. Their attitude is familial, not commercial in nature.

With a “give” attitude, they must also consider the “incident of write-off” for which they are willing to “write-off” their capital. In this case, the “incident of write-off” is the good for which they are prepared to risk their capital and “write it off.” The good is this case is the transformation of communities to fully live their potential. It is a picture of collective prosperity.

Venture philanthropists sow with the intent to provide the project with capital on favorable terms so that it can fulfill its objectives of empowering people and then releasing them. The project is a school that provides the environment where the community can learn and grow in wisdom, and thus be wise stewards of their natural resources and work capacities. Philanthropic capital liberates ventures from old bottom line constraints and so empower the enterprise with the capacity to set free communities held ‘captives’ by dominant economic power structures.

At Natural Resource Ventures, our team designs platforms for people to effectively come together and exercise their deepest caring for the world, in whatever form it takes – and to link that work to whatever resources it may need. We acknowledge that all of this is philanthropy.

By going back to the original definition of philanthropy as given by Oxford English Dictionary (OED), we see a vastly expanded definition of philanthropy, beyond giving money. Not only does this expanded definition expand our sense of what each of us can do in loving service to humanity, but it balances the value and role of what each of us can do thereby supporting our partnership as peers seeking synergy for greater shared service and impact in the world.

The nature of the relationships established in a venture philanthropic enterprise are co-creative, essentially equal relationships, with money being only one of the transactional elements. There’s a willingness and capacity to have stakeholders learning and changed by the relationship. It also requires a willingness on the part of the financier to surrender his ‘power’ and for all parties to develop a transparent, authentic, trusting, vulnerable relationship.

It calls for a thinking that is willing to cross boundaries – boundaries delineated by race, class, generation, gender or power. It recognizes the importance and necessity of bringing the voices of “marginalized” communities to the table in integrated, authentic, inclusive, and fully collaborative ways – ways that can
(a) impact, open, and change all parties,
(b) make transparent and change the dominant power paradigm and any power dynamics
(c) touch the hearts of all concerned and thereby
(d) transform relationships among our diverse selves so we can then go deeper and broader in our work together and in the world.

All parties must be aligned to the vision and mission of the enterprise. The relationship between management and investors are initiated on the basis of a shared commitment to a good cause. Venture philanthropy is a picture of true partnership with people willing to go all the way in service of ultimate possibility. In return for the investor’s willingness to provide early stage risk capital and his commitment to provide long term finance to the venture with the attitude to give, he has a stake in the resulting harvest that comes from the venture, if and when it comes, eventually.

Posted in Community development, Enterprise, Venture Philanthropy | Tagged , | Leave a comment